For Deearne’s 40th birthday this year we went to Africa so she could play with lions! She is cat mad and it had been a dream of hers for a long time, so it was a great experience for her, and one I really enjoyed as well.
While we were there I of course took a stack of photos, some of which I’m really happy with. As a consequence I thought I’d cover the gear I took with me, and what my wish list would be if I had it to do again.
Primarily for my still photography I used my Canon EOS 400D DSLR, but we also took a Canon Digital IXUS 80 IS point-and-shoot camera with us, which Deearne used, or that we took with us to dinner and other places I didn’t want to lug the SLR. On top of that there were a couple of ‘keeper’ photos I ended up taking with my iPhone, simply because it was the easiest camera I had access to in a particular spot.
For video we used a Canon Legria FS200 video camera, but again on occasions where it wasn’t convenient to bring out we used the IXUS 80 IS to capture video we otherwise wouldn’t have gotten.
By far the highlight of the trip was the time we spent in the Chobe National Park in Botswana. It is hard to describe the feeling of seeing wild lions, elephant and giraffe roaming free, and here we got to see lots. We did two game drives through the park and a cruise on the Chobe River, and on these I used the ‘kit’ Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III lens on my 400D. I got this lens bundled with my camera, and had never really used it much before, but the focal length was absolutely necessary for this trip.

When I didn’t have the 75-300 attached I used the other ‘kit’ lens I got with my camera: the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II.

I had decided just to take these two lenses before I left as between them they gave me a bit of versatility, and I decided I didn’t want to carry any others given the extra weight and the risk of losing all my lenses if we encountered some misadventure.
Given the number of photos we expected to take, I also took my laptop with me so I could empty out my memory cards each day (necessary when you are shooting in RAW), and an external hard drive to make sure they were backed up.
In addition, for this trip I also got myself a GPS tracker—a device that records GPS location data and time, which I later matched up with the time stamps in the photos so I could see where they were taken. Being a last minute purchase I ended up getting a GiZTEQ PhotoTrackr mini, as it was the only device I found that I could get delivered in time. I then used the bundled software to extract .gpx track files from the device, and subsequently imported them into Aperture to tag my photos.
As to what I would take if I had it to do over, and presuming I had a bit of time to save? Well, assuming I would still be using a crop sensor camera like my 400D (which effectively gives a 1.6 x magnification in comparison to a full frame camera), I think I’d replace the 18-55mm with the Canon EF-S 18-200 f/3.5-5.6 IS (for general outings). For most outings, other than the safari drives, I needed a lens that could do reasonably wide angles, but using the 18-55mm I was limited in not being able to zoom very far. Consequently the 18-200mm would have given me a lot more flexibility.
For the safari drives the focal length of the 75-300mm was about right, but I would have liked a lens that was a bit faster to assist in the low light of the early mornings, and to maintain a shallow depth of field for what were effectively animal portraits. But checking Canon’s website, they don’t appear to make a faster 300mm zoom. That being the case it seems hard to justify replacing my ‘kit’ lens with a more expensive IS lens, especially given I haven’t had much need for a lens of that focal length (other than this trip).
A woman who was with us on one of the safari drives and the cruise had a Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM on a Canon EOS 450D, and I must say I was a bit envious of it, but again, given how often I’d want that sort of focal length, I don’t know how I could justify paying the $2K+ price tag for it.
On the camera side though, the one thing I really wish I had had was a DSLR with video. For stills the 400D was fine, but having a separate video camera was a pain. I had to carry it in addition to the DSLR, take a separate charger and memory cards, and at any given time pick which camera I wanted to use, as it simply wasn’t feasible to have both ready to go at a moment’s notice. On top of that my Legria FS200 is standard definition only, while most of the newer video-capable DSLRs do HD. So if I had it to do over again, I would probably pick something like a Canon 550D or 7D for my body (more likely the 550D given my budget!).
I’d also make sure to take a point-and-shoot again as a backup, and to take to places where I didn’t want to cart the DSLR.
I haven’t started editing the video I took on the trip yet, but will post it once I have. In the mean time, if you are interested in the photos, they are available in these two albums on Facebook: Album 1 | Album 2 (I’ve only put a few of the photos up on Flickr).
If you’ve got any thoughts on the gear I took, or what I should have taken, let me know.
Recent Comments